itemis AG vs WebbyLab: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
itemis AG (4.5/5) edges ahead of WebbyLab (4.0/5) overall. itemis AG is the better choice for ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 functional safety consulting and compliance engineering. WebbyLab is the stronger option for full-stack architecture advisory spanning hardware, firmware, and the connected application layer. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
itemis AG vs WebbyLab: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | itemis AG | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2003 | 2011 |
| HQ | Dortmund, Germany | Kyiv, Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 220 | 120+ |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Functional safety compliance engineering as a dedicated, named business line built over more than two decades | Full-cycle advisory scope from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team |
| Pricing model | Compliance engineering consulting, model-based development tooling engagements | Project-based full-cycle IoT consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | ISO 26262, IEC 61508, Model-Based Development Tools | C, C++, IoT Connectivity Protocols |
| Industries served | Automotive, Industrial, Connected products, Safety-critical systems | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce |
itemis AG vs WebbyLab: overview
itemis AG
itemis AG was founded in 2003 in Lünen, Germany and has consolidated its headquarters in Dortmund since 2025, with a team of 220 people. The firm organizes its business around three defined areas: compliance engineering for safety-critical and connected products, model-based development tools, and custom enterprise applications, with functional safety consulting for ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 as a named, dedicated practice rather than a service tacked onto general firmware development. More than two decades of operating history in that specific compliance-engineering space gives it a track record a buyer can check against actual certified programs.
WebbyLab
WebbyLab was founded in 2011 by Anton Morozov and Viktor Turskyi and operates from Kyiv and London with more than 120 engineers across hardware, firmware, and software disciplines. The firm's full-cycle framing means architecture advisory runs from hardware selection through firmware and the cloud or mobile application layer, with IoT and embedded systems named as a core specialty and Fortune 500 clients cited among its customer base. That framing fits a buyer whose consulting question spans the whole connected-device stack, not firmware in isolation.
Services and capabilities: itemis AG vs WebbyLab
| Capability | itemis AG | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Feasibility assessment | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety consulting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: itemis AG vs WebbyLab
| Framework / platform | itemis AG | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | N/A | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 26262 | ✓ | N/A |
| IEC 61508 | ✓ | N/A |
| MISRA C | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| PCB Design | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: itemis AG vs WebbyLab
| Criterion | itemis AG | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Compliance engineering consulting, Model-based development tooling | Project-based full-cycle development |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: itemis AG vs WebbyLab
| Dimension | itemis AG | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Industrial, Connected products | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce |
| Best use cases | ISO 26262 ASIL-D safety case development for an automotive program, IEC 61508 SIL-3 compliance consulting for an industrial safety system | Whole-stack architecture advisory from hardware selection through the cloud application layer, IoT product feasibility assessment requiring cloud integration |
| Typical project type | Compliance engineering consulting | Project-based full-cycle development |
itemis AG vs WebbyLab: pros and cons
| itemis AG | |
|---|---|
| + | Functional safety compliance engineering is one of three defined business areas, not an incidental service |
| + | More than two decades of operating history specifically in safety-critical and connected-product compliance work |
| + | Model-based development tooling expertise supports the traceability requirements ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 both demand |
| + | 220 employees give substantial bench depth for concurrent ASIL-D or SIL-3 program support |
| - | Compliance engineering focus is a narrower fit for a buyer whose primary need is general-purpose firmware development rather than safety certification |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| - | Recent headquarters consolidation to Dortmund (2025) is worth confirming for office-specific engagement logistics |
| WebbyLab | |
|---|---|
| + | Full-cycle advisory scope from hardware selection through the connected application layer suits whole-stack architecture questions |
| + | 120-plus engineers gives more concurrent-program capacity than most boutique advisory firms |
| + | Fortune 500 client relationships indicate prior experience with large-organization procurement and advisory processes |
| + | 14 years of operating history under its original two founders |
| - | IoT and embedded is one specialty alongside fintech and e-commerce work, not the firm's sole advisory focus |
| - | Specific named case studies with verifiable project details are limited in public materials |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement threshold |
Who should choose itemis AG?
A typical fit: ISO 26262 ASIL-D safety case development for an automotive program.
Functional safety compliance engineering as a dedicated, named business line built over more than two decades. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial, Connected products, Safety-critical systems.
Who should choose WebbyLab?
A typical fit: whole-stack architecture advisory from hardware selection through the cloud application layer.
Full-cycle advisory scope from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce.
Decision matrix: itemis AG vs WebbyLab
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: itemis AG (Not published) vs WebbyLab (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | itemis AG |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | itemis AG |
Use case fit: itemis AG vs WebbyLab
| Use case | itemis AG fit | WebbyLab fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 26262 ASIL-D safety case development for an automotive program | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| IEC 61508 SIL-3 compliance consulting for an industrial safety system | Strong | Limited | itemis AG |
| Whole-stack architecture advisory from hardware selection through the cloud application layer | Limited | Strong | WebbyLab |
| IoT product feasibility assessment requiring cloud integration | Limited | Strong | WebbyLab |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: itemis AG vs WebbyLab
itemis AG (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Consulting projects. Functional safety compliance engineering as a dedicated, named business line built over more than two decades.
WebbyLab (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need IoT product feasibility assessment requiring cloud integration. If your situation matches that, WebbyLab is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
itemis AG vs WebbyLab FAQ
Is itemis AG better than WebbyLab?
itemis AG (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. itemis AG's strongest advantage: functional safety compliance engineering is one of three defined business areas, not an incidental service. WebbyLab's strongest advantage: full-cycle advisory scope from hardware selection through the connected application layer suits whole-stack architecture questions.
How do itemis AG and WebbyLab differ in pricing?
itemis AG uses compliance engineering consulting, model-based development tooling engagements pricing. WebbyLab uses project-based full-cycle iot consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: itemis AG or WebbyLab?
itemis AG is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between itemis AG and WebbyLab?
itemis AG's primary differentiator is: functional safety compliance engineering as a dedicated, named business line built over more than two decades. WebbyLab's primary differentiator is: full-cycle advisory scope from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team. They also differ in team size (220 vs 120+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Automotive, Industrial vs IoT hardware products, Fintech).
Verify all details directly with each consultancy before making a decision.