Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Spyrosoft (3.7/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for architecture consulting that can transition directly into full development. Spyrosoft is the stronger option for enterprise-scale advisory backed by public-company financial disclosure. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2016 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Wrocław, Poland |
| Team size | 200+ | 2,253 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status backing platform and RTOS selection advisory before development starts | Publicly listed (Warsaw Stock Exchange) engineering firm with 2,253 employees and published functional-safety standards expertise |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based and staff augmentation engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | C, C++, IEC 61508 |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | Automotive, Industrial 4.0, Enterprise software |
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in 2007 in Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware consulting practice covers platform and MCU selection, RTOS strategy, and architecture-level guidance delivered before a client commits to full development, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip and an in-house lab for hardware validation. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give an advisory engagement documented process credibility that a purely informal consulting relationship doesn't carry.
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Wrocław, Poland, listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange as Spyrosoft S.A. with 2,253 employees worldwide as of December 2025, roughly 81% concentrated in Poland. The company's embedded software engineering advisory sits within a broad services portfolio spanning enterprise software, AI/ML, cloud, cybersecurity, and user interfaces, and its own published technical guides on IEC 61508 and ISO 26262 functional safety indicate genuine in-house standards expertise, not just a listed service line. For an advisory buyer prioritizing enterprise-scale public-company backing above narrow firmware specialization, Spyrosoft is the largest publicly traded option on this list by headcount.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Feasibility assessment | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| ISO 26262 | N/A | ✓ |
| IEC 61508 | N/A | ✓ |
| MISRA C | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| PCB Design | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based engineering, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics | Automotive, Industrial 4.0, Enterprise software |
| Best use cases | Architecture and feasibility assessment before committing to a full firmware build, RTOS and MCU selection advisory for a new product line | Enterprise-scale architecture advisory requiring public-company financial backing, IEC 61508 or ISO 26262 functional safety consulting bundled with broader IT advisory |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based engineering |
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip means MCU selection advice comes with chip-vendor-level engineering support behind it |
| + | Design-phase engagement is offered as its own line item, not only as a prelude to a locked-in full build |
| + | In-house hardware lab lets architecture recommendations be validated against real silicon before a client commits budget |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give an advisory engagement a documented process a client can audit |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so a consulting engagement that leads to production still needs a separate manufacturing partner |
| - | Does not submit regulatory certification filings on the client's behalf, only supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published consulting day rate or minimum engagement figure |
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Public listing on the Warsaw Stock Exchange gives financial disclosure most private advisory competitors don't provide |
| + | 2,253 employees give substantial enterprise-scale advisory capacity for large, multi-region programs |
| + | Published in-house technical guides on IEC 61508 and ISO 26262 indicate genuine functional-safety standards expertise |
| + | 9 years of operating history with rapid growth to public-company scale |
| - | Embedded advisory is one service line inside a much broader enterprise IT and cybersecurity portfolio, not the firm's core identity |
| - | 81% workforce concentration in Poland is worth confirming against a buyer's own timezone and onsite requirements |
| - | No published pricing specific to embedded advisory work distinct from its broader IT consulting services |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: architecture and feasibility assessment before committing to a full firmware build.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status backing platform and RTOS selection advisory before development starts. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: enterprise-scale architecture advisory requiring public-company financial backing.
Publicly listed (Warsaw Stock Exchange) engineering firm with 2,253 employees and published functional-safety standards expertise. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial 4.0, Enterprise software.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Spyrosoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Spyrosoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture and feasibility assessment before committing to a full firmware build | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| RTOS and MCU selection advisory for a new product line | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Enterprise-scale architecture advisory requiring public-company financial backing | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| IEC 61508 or ISO 26262 functional safety consulting bundled with broader IT advisory | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Consulting projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status backing platform and RTOS selection advisory before development starts.
Spyrosoft (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need IEC 61508 or ISO 26262 functional safety consulting bundled with broader IT advisory. If your situation matches that, Spyrosoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Spyrosoft?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip means MCU selection advice comes with chip-vendor-level engineering support behind it. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: public listing on the Warsaw Stock Exchange gives financial disclosure most private advisory competitors don't provide.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Spyrosoft differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. Spyrosoft uses project-based and staff augmentation engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Spyrosoft?
Spyrosoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Spyrosoft?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status backing platform and RTOS selection advisory before development starts. Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: publicly listed (Warsaw Stock Exchange) engineering firm with 2,253 employees and published functional-safety standards expertise. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 2,253), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy vs Automotive, Industrial 4.0).
Verify all details directly with each consultancy before making a decision.